Faculty are not mouthpieces of their institutions. His failure to conform to the college’s “prescribed messaging” should be of no concern to the college.
Nih gag order free#
Medical faculty must be able to explore the widest array of ideas to uncover advancement in their field and share their expertise with the public.Īdditionally, his refusal to toe the party line is protected by free speech principles, which allow him to speak without administrators babysitting him. We applaud Joyner for standing up for his rights and, by extension, the rights of all Mayo Clinic faculty. As FIRE explained in our April and May letters to the college, faculty have the right to speak as private citizens on matters of public concern, which is precisely what Joyner did when sharing his expertise with the media. He consistently made clear to journalists and his college that he spoke only for himself.
A quick Google search reveals some of his latest commentary on issues related to COVID-19, public health, and sports performance.īut when Joyner made comments about convalescent plasma treatments for COVID-19 and sports performance research to CNN, The New York Times, and other media outlets, Mayo Clinic claimed he “failed to communicate in accordance with prescribed messaging.” According to administrators, that “reflect poorly on Mayo Clinic’s brand and reputation” and “caused the institution to question whether … able to appropriately represent Mayo Clinic in media interactions.”īut Joyner never represented Mayo Clinic in media interactions. Joyner is a renowned academic sought by journalists for his expertise on a range of medical issues related to his subject-matter competence. Why? Because he spoke to the press, which isn’t unusual for him.
On March 5, Mayo Clinic suspended professor Michael J. That may sound like a dystopian novel, but it’s actually happening at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science - an American institution of higher education that promises faculty free speech, but apparently has no idea what that means. Global Gag Rule global health health policy human rights sexual and reproductive health.Send an email to Chairman Michael Powell urging Mayo Clinic to rescind its retaliation against professor Joyner and reaffirm its commitment to free speech and academic freedom.Ī college suspends a professor for not adhering to “prescribed messaging,” imposes a gag order on him, and demands he say only what it tells him to say or nothing at all. We urge that the policy be repealed as part of the broader project of protecting and decolonising sexual and reproductive health globally. We conclude that the policy amounts to the neocolonial co-optation of sexual and reproductive health in the Global South to advance an ideological agenda in the Global North. We found that the policy increased the abortion rate and had a negative impact on maternal health, STIs, and the health of marginalised groups. Forty-eight articles met our eligibility criteria, and were analysed thematically, noting the effects on: the operations of non-governmental organisations maternal health sexually transmitted infections marginalised groups reproductive rights. To capture the effects of the policy to date, we conducted a scoping review in April 2020. It has been criticised for its implications for women's bodily autonomy, its censorship of non-governmental organisations and health professionals, and for its impact on the health of populations in affected countries.
It has been implemented by every Republican administration since 1984 and remains in operation at the time of writing in its most stringent and extensive form. The Global Gag Rule is a United States policy that blocks global health funding to foreign non-governmental organisations if they engage in abortion-related activities.
0 kommentar(er)
